Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

From Space Engineers Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(where are blocks?)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Suggested edits ==
 
== Suggested edits ==
 
I think [[Blocks]] should be prominent. Too hard to find now --[[User:HongPong|HongPong]] ([[User talk:HongPong|talk]]) 16:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)  
 
I think [[Blocks]] should be prominent. Too hard to find now --[[User:HongPong|HongPong]] ([[User talk:HongPong|talk]]) 16:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)  
 +
:This is a good point.  The whole thing should probably be reworked in the near future.  Feel free to edit [[Main_Page/editcopy]] how you think it should look and an admin can approve such changes to the real front page.  [[User:Ketura|Ketura]] ([[User talk:Ketura|talk]]) 12:33, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
  
 
==Protected==
 
==Protected==

Revision as of 12:33, 17 January 2015

Suggested edits

I think Blocks should be prominent. Too hard to find now --HongPong (talk) 16:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

This is a good point. The whole thing should probably be reworked in the near future. Feel free to edit Main_Page/editcopy how you think it should look and an admin can approve such changes to the real front page. Ketura (talk) 12:33, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Protected

The main page is protected from edits, but feel free to submit your edits on the editcopy page, admins will merge edits from the editcopy.

Notes

I removed the tools link from the main page because it was redundant, we already have Components and Tools --Rhine (talk) 23:09, 22 October 2013 (EDT)

Removed comments from main page because I don't want to scare new visitors :P --Rhine (talk) 00:01, 7 November 2013 (EST)

Links

I'm removing user-submitted links from the main page and will add a sub-page where people can add their communities. Prefer to keep the links on the main page "official" channels --Rhine (talk) 13:32, 16 March 2014 (EDT)

"Outdated" Tag?

(Wasn't sure where to put this, so I just put it on the main page) Perhaps we should have an "outdated" tag, to deal with the various pages that have become incorrect since certain updates? Up until now I've been counting them as stubs, but it really isn't the same thing. Additional suggestion: A "low quality" tag, for those articles that aren't in good condition. - Professor Cupcake (talk) 16:39, 5 April 2014 (EDT) I'd do these myself, but I'm green as grass with wiki formatting and haven't touched templates yet. - Professor Cupcake (talk) 13:13, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

I went ahead and did it. Hope to see this put to good use: Template:Outdated. - Professor Cupcake (talk) 15:20, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Updated Design April 6

Now with 50% less giant logo. Condensed information. Can we talk about an elegant way to handle the news section? I think a small blurb about the latest post, then a link to the archives would be best. Also - is there a variable for the latest version we can put on the main page somehow? --Rhine (talk) 13:21, 6 April 2014 (EDT)

Grade A Necro here, but I just set up Template:Current Version that can just be updated as new releases come out. Ketura (talk) 01:06, 18 October 2014 (UTC)