Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I'm removing user-submitted links from the main page and will add a sub-page where people can add their communities. Prefer to keep the links on the main page "official" channels --[[User:Rhine|Rhine]] ([[User talk:Rhine|talk]]) 13:32, 16 March 2014 (EDT) | I'm removing user-submitted links from the main page and will add a sub-page where people can add their communities. Prefer to keep the links on the main page "official" channels --[[User:Rhine|Rhine]] ([[User talk:Rhine|talk]]) 13:32, 16 March 2014 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == "Outdated" tag? == | ||
| + | (Wasn't sure where to put this, so I just put it on the main page) | ||
| + | Perhaps we should have an "outdated" tag, to deal with the various pages that have become incorrect since certain updates? Up until now I've been counting them as stubs, but it really isn't the same thing. Additional suggestion: A "low quality" tag, for those articles that aren't in good condition. - [[User:Professor Cupcake|Professor Cupcake]] ([[User talk:Professor Cupcake|talk]]) 16:39, 5 April 2014 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:39, 5 April 2014
Contents
Protected
The main page is protected from edits, but feel free to submit your edits on the editcopy page, admins will merge edits from the editcopy.
Notes
I removed the tools link from the main page because it was redundant, we already have Components and Tools --Rhine (talk) 23:09, 22 October 2013 (EDT)
Removed comments from main page because I don't want to scare new visitors :P --Rhine (talk) 00:01, 7 November 2013 (EST)
Links
I'm removing user-submitted links from the main page and will add a sub-page where people can add their communities. Prefer to keep the links on the main page "official" channels --Rhine (talk) 13:32, 16 March 2014 (EDT)
"Outdated" tag?
(Wasn't sure where to put this, so I just put it on the main page) Perhaps we should have an "outdated" tag, to deal with the various pages that have become incorrect since certain updates? Up until now I've been counting them as stubs, but it really isn't the same thing. Additional suggestion: A "low quality" tag, for those articles that aren't in good condition. - Professor Cupcake (talk) 16:39, 5 April 2014 (EDT)
